Publications by Author: Milstein, Deborah

2018
Milstein, D., Madden, S.L. & Chahine, T., 2018. Tackling Youth Substance Abuse on Staten Island: A Collective Impact Project, Harvard Business Publishing: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health case collection. Available from Harvard Business PublishingAbstract

This case focuses on the challenges of keeping a collective impact program—the Tackling Youth Substance Abuse (TYSA) program on Staten Island—focused and effective over time, a problem faced by many collaborative community-based efforts. The TYSA program was founded in 2012 as a cross-sector collaborative response to the alarming rates of substance abuse on Staten Island, using a collective impact framework.

In the four years since its founding, TYSA had accomplished a great deal. But by October 2016, when the case opens, many of the original members of TYSA’s steering committee—most of whom had been high-level decision-makers in their organizations—were delegating their spots to mid-level staff who were not empowered to make organizational decisions. In addition, TYSA’s early successes against prescription drug abuse were increasingly overshadowed by a growing opioid problem on the Island and by a continuing culture of alcohol abuse by underage teens. A subtler challenge was that, in the Staten Island community, TYSA was over-identified with Adrienne Abbate, TYSA’s Project Director, herself; how could TYSA shift the community’s perception to demonstrate the program’s value beyond its leader?

Project Director Adrienne Abbate decided to pull TYSA’s executive leadership and staff together to discuss strategies to reinvigorate the program and to sustain the momentum they had fought so hard to create.

2016
Milstein, D. & Bhabha, J., 2016. Kids in Need of Defense (KIND): The Challenges of Child Migration to the United States, Harvard Business Publishing: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health case collection. Available from Harvard Business PublishingAbstract
Since the flood of child migrants from Central America burst upon the southern United States in the summer of 2014—a vast rise in arrivals dubbed “the Surge”—Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) had been facing overwhelming demand for its legal services. Wendy Young, KIND’s president, explained that the organization’s primary mission was to ensure that no child appears alone in immigration court, but KIND also wanted to provide leadership, research, and advocacy to protect these “children on the move” from laws and practices that threatened their fundamental human rights. Ms. Young was facing a critical juncture in the organizational life of KIND: where and how should it focus its resources for greatest effectiveness in protecting child migrants? What limits must the organization set on its activities when facing an almost unlimited need for legal, social, health, and educational support of these vulnerable children?
2015
Milstein, D., Madden, S.L. & MacCracken, L., 2015. Integrating Private Practice and Hospital-Based Breast Services at Baystate Health (Parts A & B), Harvard Business Publishing: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health case collection. Available from Harvard Business PublishingAbstract
Dr. Laurie Gianturco (“Dr. G.”), Chief of Radiology at Baystate Health and President of the private imaging practice Radiology & Imaging, Inc. (“R&I”), and her partner for this project, Suzanne Hendery, VP of Marketing & Communications at Baystate Health, considered their new assignment. With Baystate leadership’s full executive sponsorship and support, but no additional budget, they were tasked with consolidating two competing practices—one operated by R&I, the other by Baystate Medical Center—to form a new breast services center under the Baystate umbrella. The consolidation would simplify redundant Baystate-affiliated breast services offerings, making the system less confusing for patients and providers while giving Baystate the opportunity to offer more patient-centered services as well as reducing its operating costs and boosting revenues. They knew it would be a complicated project, involving two competing physician practice cultures, three clinical specialty orientations, the potential disruption of existing referral networks, and the merger of imaging services for healthy women along with treatment for women with breast cancer. Despite these challenges, they banded together to define a patient-driven culture, create an integrated program, and build a strong brand anchored by the new facility. Their goal was to gain a competitive advantage by developing a relationship-based approach that would exceed customer (patients and referring physicians) expectations for service. “The financial argument was the easy part,” Dr. G reflected. “How to actually design a model of care is where we came to an impasse.”